... or might this title really be a bad idea? If I'm depressed, seeking help in my neighborhood Barnes & Noble, it seems to me the last thing I need is for the book I'm seeking help from, to call me a dummy, before I even open the cover. Even Dr. Laura, in her 10 Stupid Things series hasn't been that bold.
Like many people, for years, I have found the "genius" of this book series in the notion that you can have a For Dummies book for anything. I think this book proves that theory wrong.
Even more, this book shows that while good design of all sorts exists all around us (including this book series in its own way). Great design is truly rare and perfect design is simply impossible.
I've heard many people look to the Eames molded plywood lounge chair as an example of perfect design. I'm 6'8", and frankly look and feel a little silly sitting in one. I still want one. Then again, I also drive a MINI and ride a Vespa.
Design, whether it be research design, strategic design, graphic design, environmental design, or experience design, will always be about managing compromises and limitations. With such a strong focus on brands coming from clients and an emphasis on briefs coming from agencies over the past few decades, how is it that so many people still don't know how or when to limit their brand's offerings? What are other examples of seemingly perfect design? Who seems to recognize their limitations and who dilutes their wonderful (or potentially wonderful) brand every opportunity they get? Better yet, what are you doing to keep your brand consistently in context and where are you falling down?
Recent Comments